Analyzing twin primes, Goldbach's strong conjecture and Polignac's conjecture
Main Article Content
Abstract
Here we analyze three well-known conjectures: (i) the existence of infinitely many twin primes, (ii) Goldbach's strong conjecture, and (iii) Polignac's conjecture. We show that the three conjectures are related to each other. In particular, we see that in analysing the validity of Goldbach's strong conjecture, one must consider also the existence of an infinite number of twin primes. As a consequence of how we approach this analysis, we also observe that if this conjecture is true, then so is Polignac's conjecture. Our first step is an analysis of the existence of infinitely many twin prime numbers. For this, using the formula 4((n−1)!+1) ≡−n (mod n(n + 2)) – satisfied if and only if (n, n + 2) are twin primes –, together with Wilson's theorem, we obtain conditions that must be met for two numbers to be twin primes. Our results, obtained from an analytic and functional study, lead us to conclude that there may exist infinitely many twin primes. Next, we consider the validity of Goldbach's strong conjecture. After showing that the conjecture is true for the first even numbers, we notice a pattern that we analyze for any even number, reducing it to three cases: (i) when the even number 2n is two times a prime number n; (ii) when the even number 2n is such that n=2m, with 2m-1 and 2m+1 twin primes; (iii) all other cases, i.e., for any 2n even number ∀n∈N with n > 1, n prime or not, with independence of n=2m being 2m-1 and 2m+1 twin primes or not. In this last case, we show that one can always find a certain r∈N such that 1 < r < n satisfying that n − r and n + r are primes, so that their sum is 2n. In this case, we use the reduction to absurd method, and our results lead us to conclude that Goldbach's strong conjecture is true to the best of our calculations, and Polignac's conjecture as well.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2024 Orús–Lacort M, et al.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.
We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]
Explanation
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:
License Name |
Permission to read and download |
Permission to display in a repository |
Permission to translate |
Commercial uses of manuscript |
CC BY 4.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.
Jouis C, Rahman MY, Ganascia JG. Neo-Topological Approach to Reasoning on Ontologies with Exceptions and Comparison with Defeasible Description Logics. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 2013). 2013.
Jouis C, Guy F, Habib B, Ganascia JG. Combination of Topology and Nonmonotonic Logics for Typicality in a Scientific Field: Paleoanthropology. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, Miami, Florida, USA. 2013.
Latorre JI, Sierra G. There is entanglement in the primes. 2014. arXiv:1403.4765.
Latorre JI, Sierra G. Quantum computation of prime number functions. Quantum Information and Computation. 2014; 14: 0577.
Southier ALM, Santos LF, Souto Ribeiro PH, Ribeiro AD. Identifying primes from entanglement dynamics. Phys. Rev. A. 2023; 108: 042404.
Sanchis-Lozano MA, Barbero GAF, Navarro-Salas J. Prime numbers, quantum field theory and the Goldbach conjecture. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 2012; 27: 23; 1250136.
Prudencio T, Silva EO. Goldbach conjecture sequences in quantum mechanics. 2013. arXiv:1303.6476.
Jouis C. Dealing with Atypicality using neo-Topology: Application to Paleontology, Conference Toth 2012, Terminology and Ontology: Theories and applications. At: Chambery, France. 2012; 1.
De Polignac A. "Recherches nouvelles sur les nombres premiers" New research on prime numbers. Comptes rendus (in French). 1849; 29: 397–401. From p. 400: "1st Theorem. Every even number is equal to the difference of two consecutive prime numbers in an infinite number of ways..
Tao T. Small and Large Gaps Between the Primes. Video lecture. UCLA Department of Mathematics. 2014.
Maggie M. First proof that infinitely many prime numbers come in pairs. Nature. 2013. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.12989. ISSN 0028-0836.
Yitang Z. Bounded gaps between primes. Annals of Mathematics. 2014; 179 (3): 1121-1174. doi:10.4007/annals.2014.179.3.7. MR 3171761.
Terence T. Polymath proposal: bounded gaps between primes. 2013.
Xhang Y. Bounded gaps between primes. Annals of Mathematics. 2014; 14 (8): 1121-1174.
Chris CK. Are all primes (past 2 and 3) of the forms 6n+1 and 6n-1?. The Prime Pages. The University of Tennessee at Martin. 2018.
Brun V. Über das Goldbachsche Gesetz und die Anzahl der Primzahlpaare. (About Goldbach's law and the number of prime number pairs). Archiv for Mathematik og Naturvidenskab (in German). 1915; 34 (8): 3-19. ISSN 0365-4524, JFM 45.0330.16
John OCJ, Edmund RF. Abu Ali al-Hasan ibn al-Haytham. MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive, University of St Andrews. https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Al-Haytham/
Waring E. Meditationes Algebraicae (Algebraic meditations) (Cambridge, England. 1770; 218. (in Latin).
Joseph LL. Demonstration d'un théorème nouveau concernant les nombres premiers. (Proof of a new theorem concerning prime numbers), Nouveaux Mémoires de l'Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres (Berlin). 1771; 2: 125-137.
Vacca G. On Leibniz's unpublished manuscripts, Bulletin of bibliography and history of mathematical sciences, Manuscripts kept at the Royal Public Library in Hanover (Germany). 1899; 2: 113-116.
Wolf M, Wolf F, Villemin FX. On the distribution of consecutive composite odd numbers and twin primes”. Fundamental Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences. 2019; 11 (1): 1-24.
Gensel B. An Elementary Proof of the Twin Prime Conjecture. Turkish Journal of Analysis and Number Theory. 2020; 8(3): 52-56.
Diouf M. On the distribution of twin primes. International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences. 2021; 16(4): 173-186.
Eric WW. Goldbach Conjecture. From MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource. 2002. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachConjecture.htmlhttps://mathworld.wolfram.com/GoldbachConjecture.html
Oliveira e Silva T, Herzog S, Gardi S. Empirical verification of the even Goldbach conjecture and computation of prime gaps up to . Mathematics of Computation. 2014; 83 (288): 2033-2060.
Zenil H.`Goldbach's Conjecture. Wolfram Demonstrations Project. 2007.
Nikolai CG. On the Goldbach problem. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. 1937; 17: 335-338.
Van der Corput JG. Sur l'hypothèse de Goldbach. (On Goldbach's hypothesis) (PDF). Proc. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam (in French). 1938; 41: 76-80.
Estermann T. On Goldbach's problem: proof that almost all even positive integers are sums of two primes. Proc. London Math. Soc. 1938; 2: 44; 307-314. doi:10.1112/plms/s2-44.4.307.
Schnirelmann LG. On the additive properties of numbers. first published in Proceedings of the Don Polytechnic Institute in Novocherkassk (in Russian). 1930; 16: 3-27. and reprinted in "Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk" (in Russian), 1939, no. 6, 9–25.
Schnirelmann LG. First published as "Über additive Eigenschaften von Zahlen" (On additive properties of numbers) in "Mathematische Annalen" (in German), 1933; 107: 649-690 and reprinted as "On the additive properties of numbers" in "Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk" (in Russian) 1940; 7: 7–46.
Helfgott HA. The ternary Goldbach conjecture is true. arXiv: 1312.7748. 2013.
Chen JR. On the representation of a larger even integer as the sum of a prime and the product of at most two primes. Sci. Sinica. 1973; 16: 157-176.
Heath-Brown DR, Puchta JC. Integers represented as a sum of primes and powers of two. Asian Journal of Mathematics. 2002; 6 (3): 535–565.
Helfgott HA. Major arcs for Goldbach theorem. 2013. arXiv:1305.2897.
Helfgott HA. Minor arcs for Goldbach problem. 2012. arXiv: 1205.5252.
Drăgoi AL. A Matricial Aspect of Goldbach’s Conjecture. JAMCS. 2017; 25(2): 1-32. JAMCS.36895;
Mahmud A. The Probabilistic Heuristic Justification for the Goldbach's Strong Conjecture. International Journal of Scientific and Innovative Mathematical Research (IJSIMR). 2020; 8 (4): 47-50.