The modern mathematical models in economics and finance

Main Article Content

Peter Brusov
Tatiana Filatova*
Veniamin Kulik

Abstract

With this article, we open a new section in this journal: the application of mathematical methods in economics and finance. A few topics we would like to discuss to get started are corporate finance, investments, business valuation, taxation, and ratings. We describe shortly mathematical models in these areas. In the field of corporate finance, we discuss the foundations of two main theories of capital structure, the Modigliani-Miller and the modern theory of Brusov-Filatova-Orekhova (BFO theory). We compare them and describe the differences between them and their results. In the field of investments, we describe two modern investment models: (1) with debt repayment at the end of the project and (2) with uniform debt repayment and discuss their properties and applications. In business valuation, we discuss the problems that exist in this area and ways to solve them. In rating methodology, a new approach is devoted to the rating of non–financial issuers, as well as to long–term and arbitrary duration project rating. The key factors of a new approach are the adequate use of discounting of financial flows virtually not used in existing rating methodologies, and the incorporation of rating parameters (financial "ratios") into the modern theory of capital structure (Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova (BFO) theory). This article is devoted to the analysis of the theoretical mathematical methods and models based on first principles. The novelty of this consideration is due to the fact that we are considering and discussing recently developed mathematical models in economics and finance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Brusov, P., Filatova, T., & Kulik, V. (2023). The modern mathematical models in economics and finance. Annals of Mathematics and Physics, 001–007. https://doi.org/10.17352/amp.S1.000001
Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.

We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.

Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]

Explanation

'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.

Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.

With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:

License Name

Permission to read and download

Permission to display in a repository

Permission to translate

Commercial uses of manuscript

CC BY 4.0

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.

Мodigliani F, Мiller M. The cost of capital, corporate finance, and the theory of investment. Am. Econ. Rev. 1958; 48: 261–297.

Мodigliani F, Мiller M. Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. Am. Econ. Rev. 1963; 53: 147–175.

Modigliani F, Miller M. Some estimates of the cost of capital to the electric utility industry 1954–1957. Am. Econ. Rev. 1966; 56: 333–391.

Filatova Т, Orehova N, Brusova А. Weighted average cost of capital in the theory of Modigliani–Miller, modified for a finite lifetime company. Bull FU. 2008; 48: 68–77. [Google Scholar]

Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N, Eskindarov M. Modern Corporate Finance, Investments, Taxation and Ratings, 2nd ed. Springer Nature Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. 2018; 1–571.

Brusov P, Filatova T, Orekhova N. The Brusov–Filatova–Orekhova Theory of Capital Structure: Applications in Corporate Finance, Investments, Taxation and Ratings. Springer Nature. 2023; 769.

Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N, Kulik V. The Golden Age of the Company: (Three Colors of Company's Time). Journal of Reviews on Global Economics. 2015; 4: 21–42.

Brusov P, Filatova T, Orehova N, Kulk V. A "Golden Age" of the Companies: Conditions of Its Existence. J Rev Global Econ. 2018; 7: 88–103.

Brusov P, Filatova T. Capital Structure Theory: Past, Present, Future. Mathematics. 2023; 11(3): 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030616

Sharpe WF. Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. The Journal of Finance. 1964; 19(3): 425–442.

Mossin J. Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market. Econometrica. 1966; 768–783.

Lintner J. The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1965; 13–37.

Fama EF, French KR. The Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance. 1992; 47(2): 427–465.

Fama EF, French KR. Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics. 1993; 33(1): 3–56.

Fama EF, French KR. Size and Book‐to‐market Factors in Earnings and Returns. The Journal of Finance. 1995; 50(1): 131–155.

Fama EF. The behavior of stock–market prices. J Bus. 1965; 38: 34–105.

Hamada R. Portfolio Analysis, Market Equilibrium, and Corporate Finance. J Finance. 1969; 24: 13–31.

Hamada R. The Effect of the Firm’s Capital Structure on the Systematic Risk of Common Stocks. The Journal of Finance. 1972; 435-452.

Leal D, Jiménez R, Riquelme M, Leiva V. Elliptical Capital Asset Pricing Models: Formulation, Diagnostics, Case Study with Chilean Data, and Economic Rationale. Mathematics. 2023; 11(6): 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11061394

Zhou G. Asset–pricing tests under alternative distributions. J Financ. 1993; 48: 1927–1942.

Lange KL, Little RJ, Taylor JM. Robust statistical modeling using the t distribution. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989; 84: 881–896.

Chen J, Wu Y, Xu Y. Research and analysis of asset pricing model based on the empirical test of stock price. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry. Guangzhou China. 22–24 October 2021; 1288–1293.

Blattberg RC, Gonedes NJ. A comparison of the stable and student distributions as statistical models for stock prices. J Bus. 1974; 47: 244–280.

Becker DM. The difference between Modigliani–Miller, and Miles–Ezzell and its consequences for the valuation of annuities. Cogent Economics & Finance. 2021; 9 (1).

Cooper IA, Nyborg KG. The value of tax shields IS equal to the present value of tax shields. Journal of Financial Economics. 2006. Elsevier

Lambrecht B, Myers SC. The dynamics of investment, payout, and debt. Work Pap Mass Inst Technol. 2015.

Lemmon ML, Roberts MR, Zender J. Back to the beginning: persistence and the cross-section of corporate capital structure. J. Finance. 2008; 63(4):1575–1608.

Lemmon ML, Zender J. Debt capacity and tests of capital structure theories. J Financ Quant Anal. 2010; 45:1161-1187

Lintner J. Distribution of incomes of corporations between dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. Am Econ Rev. 1956; 46: 97-113.

Lintner J. Optimal dividends and corporate growth under uncertainty. Q J Econ. 1965; 77:59-95.

Majd S, Myers SC. Tax asymmetries and corporate income tax reform. In The Effects of Taxation on Capital Accumulation, ed. M Feldstein. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chic. Press. 1987; 343-373.

Majluf NS. Study on mergers: a rationale for conglomerate mergers. Ph.D. Thesis, Mass. Inst Technol Cambridge. 1978.

Merton RC, Perold AF. Theory of risk capital in financial firms. J Appl Corp Finance. 1993; 6:16-32.

Miles J, Ezzell R. The weighted average cost of capital, perfect capital markets, and project life: a clarification. J Financ Quant Anal. 1980; 15(3):719-730.

Brusov P, Filatova T, Orekhova N. Ratings: Critical analysis and new approaches of quantitative and qualitative methodology. Springer Nature. 2021; 369.