Ego Involvement and the Law of Exercise: Memorization as a Function of Ego Involvement in Folklore Scholarship and Anthropology

Main Article Content

Hasan El-Shamy

Abstract

Abstract           


The article is a component in my "Folkloric Behavior", a total innovation within my "Folkloric Behavior" (1967), which introduced a theoretical system for analyzing a folkloric phenomenon in a cognitive verifiable context. The universal psychosocial principles constituting the system were applied to a real (live) community: the ethnic Arabs living in Brooklyn, N.Y., USA, with particular emphasis on the Egyptian component. This approach stood in sharp contrast to the dominant Freudian psychoanalytic and Jungian analytical psychology theories that dominate this field.


Terms, concepts, and processes offered in this innovative work are currently being used—often in isolation of their academic home and systemic links-- in various folklore fields. Examples of current usage are: "ego-involvement", "learning process", "extinction", “motivation”, “intervening stimuli/cues [(re-presented as) “negotiations”, etc.). Ironically, my founding work on “Folkloric Behavior” is hardly ever evaluated or even mentioned.


It would be useful to afford students of folk traditions and other readers the benefits of research objectivity of tracking the temporal sequence in which these key issues appeared in folklore scholarship. This step would be required for also establishing the history of ideas in a discipline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Hasan El-Shamy. (2024). Ego Involvement and the Law of Exercise: Memorization as a Function of Ego Involvement in Folklore Scholarship and Anthropology. Chronicles of Behavioral Psychology, 004–008. https://doi.org/10.17352/cbp.000002
Review Articles

Copyright (c) 2024 El-Shamy HM.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.

We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.

Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]

Explanation

'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.

Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.

With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:

License Name

Permission to read and download

Permission to display in a repository

Permission to translate

Commercial uses of manuscript

CC BY 4.0

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.

James W. Principles of psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Holt; 1891; 662-663.

Hunter M. Memory. New York: Random House; 1955; 96-97.

Cofer C, Appley M. Motivation. New York: Wiley; 1964; 784.

Young P.T. Motivation and emotion. New York: Wiley; 1965; 529.

Alper TG. Task orientation vs. ego orientation in learning and repetition. Am J Psychol. 1946;59:236-248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416887 . Alper TG. Task orientation and ego orientation as factors in reminiscence. J Exp Psychol. 1948;38:224-238.

James W. Principles of psychology. New York: Holt; 1891; 662.

Malinowski B. Myths in primitive psychology. New York: Penguin; 1963; 102.

Dégh L. Some questions on the social function of storytelling. In: 137-138. Dégh L. Märchen, Erzähler und Erzählgemeinschaft. 95-96.

Grudde H. What I mean: Low German fairy tales from East Prussia. wrote down. Folklore Fellows Communications. 1932;102:95-96.

Brinkmann O. Das Erzählen in einer Dorfgemeinschaft. Münster i.W.1933; 26-27.

Uffer L. Rätoromanische Märchen und ihre Erzähler. Basel: 945:75.

Delargy J. The Gaelic storyteller. 20-21.

Thompson S. The folktale. New York: Holt; 1946; 454.

Traditionally, "Myth" is limited to primitive societies; Dorson contends that "If by mythology is meant priestly and literary tradition, then it belongs to a different class of cultural artifacts from folk tradition. The Euro American folklorist does not encounter mythical tales, since these have long ceased to enjoy oral currency." "Current Folklore Theories,".108.

Although memorates are by definition limited to the individual, a memorate is, generally, based on a communal belief.

Jansen WH. The esoteric-exoteric factor in folklore. Fabula. 1959;2:206-207.

Drever J. A dictionary of psychology. New York: Longmans; 1952;28.

Britt SH. Social psychology of modern life. New York: 1949;182. Young P.T. Motivation and emotion. New York: Wiley; 1965;339-340.

MacIver RM. The web of government. New York: Macmillan; 1947;4.

Malinowski B. Myth in primitive psychology. New York: Penguin; 1963;107.

Christiansen RTh. Myth, metaphor, and simile. 39-40.

Bidney D. Theoretical anthropology. New York: 1960; 300-301.

Boas F. Mythology and folklore. In: Boas F, editor. General anthropology. New York: D. Appleton-Century Company; 1938; 609-610:616.

Malinowski B. Myth in primitive psychology. New York: Penguin; 1963;100-101.

MacIver RM. The web of government. New York: Macmillan; 1947;4-5.

Young K. Social psychology. New York: 196-197.

Jung C, Kerényi K. Essays on a science of mythology. New York: Pantheon; 1969;219.

Bidney D. Theoretical anthropology. New York: 1960; 324. Bidney D. Myth, symbolism, and truth. 1.

Thompson S. The folktale. New York: Holt; 1946;9. Thompson S. Myths and folktales. 106.

Christiansen RTh. Myth, metaphor, and simile. 39-40.

Greenway J. Literature among the primitives. 39.

Dorson A. Folk legends of Japan. 18.

Ibid. 20.

Grimm J, Grimm W. Deutsche sagen. Berlin: 1865;1:5.

Dorson A. Folk legends of Japan. 19.

Thompson S. The folktale. New York: Holt; 1946; 8.

Günter H. Psychologie der legende. Baden: 1949; 4-5.

Jameson RD, Metraux A. Local legend. In: Standard dictionary of folklore, mythology, and legend. 2:640.

Young K. Social psychology. 196-197.

Von Sydow B. Selected papers on folklore. 73.

Honko L. Memorates and the study of folk beliefs. 10.

Ibid. 12.

Honko L. Memorates and the study of folk belief. 13.

Taylor A. Proverb. 902.

Greenway J. Literature among the primitives. 84.

Drever J. A dictionary of psychology. New York: Longmans; 1952; 239.

Sarnoff I. Personality dynamics and development. New York: 1962; 230.

Young K. Social psychology. 200-201.

Sappenfield BR. Personality dynamics: an integrative psychology of adjustment. New York: 1961; 381.