Cite this as
Cosgun MS, Cosgun C, Degirmenci H (2021) Return to Former Activities of Daily Living for Cardiovascular Patients in COVID-19. J Cardiovasc Med Cardiol 8(1): 014-016. DOI: 10.17352/2455-2976.000162Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. Despite all the strict precautions, the epidemic probably continues rapidly due to new mutations and negatively affects the whole world. The presence of comorbid diseases has been associated with poor clinical outcomes. We aimed to examine the return of COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular comorbidity to their former Activities of Daily Living (ADL).
Methods: The research population was selected from patients who admitted to the outpatient clinic from November 2020 to January 2021. 80 consecutive patients with cardiovascular comorbidity were included in the Study Group (SG). The Control Group (CG) included 100 patients of similar age range and gender, without cardiovascular comorbidities. Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) test was performed in both groups to evaluate changes in ADL. Outpatients were visited until return to their former ADL with telecommunications at appropriate intervals.
Results: Symptoms limiting ADL, such as fatigue (weakness), shortness of breath, and myalgia, were significantly higher in SG than CG (p < 0.05). In contrast, anosmia and ageusia were significantly higher in CG than SG (p < 0.001). Pre-COVID-19 NHP scores were similar in both groups. However, at admission, SG’s NHP scores were significantly higher than CG’s (p < 0.001). Related to this, limitations in ADL (p < 0.001) and recovery times (p < 0.05) were higher in SG than CG.
Conclusion: In this study, we observed that COVID-19 was more symptomatic in those with cardiovascular comorbidities, such as a higher limitation in ADL and a longer recovery time.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which started to spread from the wet animal market in the state of Wuhan in China at the end of 2019, was declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020 [1]. This is the third outbreak by coronaviruses in the 21st century. Until 20 years ago, coronavirus infections were known to cause mild respiratory illness [2]. However more than 100 million people have already been infected with this virus, and more than 2 million people have died from COVID-19 related causes [3]. Despite vaccination, strict precautions, and the lock-down, the outbreak continues rapidly, likely due to new mutations, and negatively affecting the whole world [4].
While COVID-19 is known to primarily affect the lung system, its impact extends far beyond the respiratory system and affects other organs of the body. Extrapulmonary symptoms of COVID-19 (cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, ocular, dermatological, and neurological) are more common than is thought [5]. The clinical course of the disease is usually mild, less frequently severe, and critical (81%, 14%, and 5%, respectively) [6]. Cough and fever (above 37.8º) are the most common symptoms at admission and are present at 67.8% and 43.8%, respectively. In addition, symptoms that limit Activities of Daily Living (ADL) such as fatigue (lassitude), shortness of breath, and myalgia are common (38.1%, 18.7%, and 14.7%, respectively) [7,8]. The presence of comorbid diseases has been associated with poor clinical outcomes such as prolonged hospitalization, increased referral for intensive care units, and death [9-13]. Based on this informations, we aimed to examine COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular comorbidity the return to their former ADL.
Ethics committee approval was received from the ‘’Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University’’ (Chairperson: Kezban Meltem ÇOLAK, date: 07/07/2020, meeting no: 07 and protocol number: 06) also from the ‘’Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health’’. Patients have given their informed consent for participation in the research study.
The study population was selected from patients who admitted to the outpatient clinic between November 2020 and January 2021. Those with orthopedic and neurological diseases and asymptomatic patients were excluded. 80 consecutive patients with cardiovascular comorbidity were included in the Study Group (SG). The Control Group (CG) included 100 patients of similar age range and gender to avoid selection bias, without cardiovascular comorbidities. Cardiovascular comorbid diseases were accepted as Hypertension (HT), Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), and heart failure (HF). All patients were in the mild disease group according to the definitions in the “COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 INFECTION) GUIDE” published by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health and hospitalization was not required. Mild illness presents with features such as fever, muscle/joint pain, cough, sore throat, and nasal congestion, with or without mild pneumonia together with a respiratory rate < 30/min and an O2 saturation above 90% while breathing room air [14]. The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was positive in the nasopharyngeal swab in all patients. Demographic and clinical characteristics of all patients were recorded. Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) test was performed in both groups to evaluate changes in ADL [15]. While performing the NHP test, two different results were obtained considering both the current and previous conditions of the patients. The limitations in ADL were calculated by the difference between the two results. Outpatients were visited until return to their former ADL with telecommunications at appropriate intervals. The data obtained from both groups were compared with each other.
The data obtained were analyzed using an SPSS 20.0 software for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) and checked for suitability for a normal distribution with the Shapiro-Wilk test. All categorical data were studied with the chi-square test. The threshold for significance was defined at p < 0.05.
The age, gender distributions, and body mass index of both groups were similar. Smoking habit in CG and diabetes mellitus in SG was higher significantly (p < 0.001). There was no difference between the two groups in other comorbidities such as pulmonary disease and renal failure (Table 1). The most common cardiovascular comorbidity was HT (85%), followed by CAD (30%) and HF (15%), respectively (Figure 1). The cough and fever were the most common symptoms in both groups, similarly. Symptoms that limit ADL such as fatigue (lassitude), shortness of breath, and myalgia were significantly higher in SG than CG (p < 0.05). In contrast, anosmia and ageusia were significantly higher in CG than SG (p < 0.001) (Figure 2). Pre-COVID-19 NHP scores were similar in both groups. However, at admission, SG’s NHP scores were significantly higher than CG’s (p < 0.001). As a result, limitations in ADL (p < 0.001) and recovery times (p < 0.05) were higher in SG than CG (Table 2, Figure 3).
SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause heart damage through a variety of mechanisms, including the expression of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors, leading to a cytokine storm, can elicit an exaggerated host immune response [16].
The present study is based on the observation of COVID-19 outpatients. The relationship between the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities and limitations in ADL was studied in patients with mild disease.
There was no difference in demographic characteristics of the patients except for their smoking habits. Likewise, the basic symptoms of the disease were similar. Patients with cardiovascular comorbidity had a higher limitation in ADL and longer recovery time. The excess of these signs indicates that the disease is more symptomatic in this group [17]. In contrast, symptoms such as anosmia and ageusia were more common in those without comorbid diseases. The more frequent upper respiratory tract symptoms indicate that the disease is milder [18,19].
In this study, we observed that COVID-19 was more symptomatic in those with cardiovascular comorbidities, such as a higher limitation in ADL and a longer recovery time.
limitations of the study: The most important limitations of our study are the low number of patients and conducted single center.