Hurdles for Starting Ministernotomy Aortic Valve Replacement Program
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Research article regarding hurdles for starting ministernotomy Aortic valve replacement program in Grant Medical College, Mumbai and techniques to overcome them. Here we studied twenty patients of aortic valve replacement surgery out of which ten are operated by ministernotomy and ten by full sternotomy in our institution, from May 2013 to May 2016.Middle age patients are selected out of which seven had regurgitant and three had stenotic lesion of aortic valve. Our observations are sternotomy time was more in initial cases but it decreased with experience. We faced difficulties in deairing heart and giving shock with routine internal shock paddles. It required special sterile external shock paddles. We required conversion to full sternotomy in two patients because heart continued to fibrillate even giving shock with paediatric internal shock paddles. CPB time, cross clamp time, CCU stay was same as compared to full sternotomy AVR patients. Cosmetically incision was better. Even with early difficulties and hurdles we continued our efforts to improve and succeeded in it. Ministernotomy AVR will always maintain its place in between full sternotomy AVR and minithoracotomy AVR.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2016 Nagre SW.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.
We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]
Explanation
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:
|
License Name |
Permission to read and download |
Permission to display in a repository |
Permission to translate |
Commercial uses of manuscript |
|
CC BY 4.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.
Benetti FJ, Mariani MA, Rizzardi JL, Benetti I (1997) Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 113: 806-807 .
Liu J, Sidiropoulos A, Konertz W (1999) Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16: S80-83 .
Detter C, Deuse T, Boehm DH, Reichenspurner H, Reichart B (2002) Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 50: 337-341 .
Svensson LG, D’Agostino RS (1998) “J” incision minimal-access valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 66: 1110-1112.
Tabata M, Khalpey Z, Shekar PS, Cohn LH (2008) Reoperative minimal access aortic valve surgery: minimal mediastinal dissection and minimal injury risk. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136: 1564-1568.
Byrne JG, Aranki SF, Couper GS, et al. (1999) Reoperative aortic valve replacement: partial upper hemisternotomy versus conventional full sternotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118: 991-997 .