Extreme Stent Malapposition after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Bifurcation Lesions: An Optical Coherence Tomography
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Anecdotal cases of bifurcation lesion stenting indicated that a wrong kissing Balloon Inflation (KBI) technique can lead to extreme stent malapposition with even stent crushing. The aim of this study was to quantify the occurrence of this finding, despite achieving acceptable angiographic results.
Methods: A total of 229 bifurcation lesions were included in this study. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) was obtained immediately after KBI. The stented bifurcation lesions were classified into 2 groups: group 1 with extreme malapposition (malapposition distance ≥ 1mm and in-stent minimal Cross Sectional Area (CSA) <70% of the distal reference CSA), and group 2 (malapposition distance <1mm and/or in-stent CSA >70% of the distal reference CSA).
Results: OCT revealed a mean stent malapposition distance of 0.43 ± 0.47 mm extending for a mean length of 1.88 ± 1.82 mm. Forty four cases (19.2%) of extreme stent malapposition were observed, and characterized by a stent malapposition distance of 1.49 ± 0.3 mm. These stents were under-expanded with lower stent eccentricity index (SEI), compared with those without extreme malapposition (48.38 ± 9.67 vs. 60.97 ± 33.29, p=0.46 and 0.57 ± 0.15 vs. 0.74 ± 0.89, p<0.001, respectively). This is mainly attributed to the wrong passage of guide-wires, while performing wire exchange during KBI technique.
Conclusion: The bifurcation stenting requiring a KBI technique can be complicated by an extreme degree of stent malapposition; or even stent crushing in some cases, caused by the wrong passage of one or both guide-wires through the stents, during the wire exchange.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2020 Refaat H.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.
We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]
Explanation
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:
|
License Name |
Permission to read and download |
Permission to display in a repository |
Permission to translate |
Commercial uses of manuscript |
|
CC BY 4.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.
Sharma SK, Sweeny J, Kini AS (2010) Coronary bifurcation lesions: a current update. Cardiol Clin 28: 55-70. Link: https://bit.ly/33TzQGW
Hildick-Smith D, Lassen JF, Albiero R, Lefevre T, Darremont O, et al (2010) Consensus from the 5th European Bifurcation Club meeting. EuroIntervention 6: 34-38. Link: https://bit.ly/2JDzvkZ
Prati F, Di Vito L, Biondi-Zoccai G, Occhipinti M, La Manna A, et al. (2012) Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide decision-making during percutaneous coronary intervention: The Centro per la Lotta contro l’Infarto-Optimisation of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) study. EuroIntervention 8: 823-829. Link: https://bit.ly/36Y4EIA
Burzotta F, Talarico GP, Trani C, De Maria GL, Pirozzolo G, et al. (2014) Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography findings in patients with bifurcated lesions undergoing provisional stenting. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15: 547-555. Link: https://bit.ly/3gpdwKs
Imola F, Mallus MT, Ramazzotti V, Manzoli A, Pappalardo A, et al. (2010) Safety and feasibilty of frequency domain optical coherence tomography to guide decision making in percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention 6: 575-581. Link: https://bit.ly/33YbrzY
Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M (2006) A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. Rev Esp Cardiol 59: 183. Link: https://bit.ly/37LN9un
Louvard Y, Lefèvre T (2011) Tools & Techniques: PCI in coronary bifurcations lesions. Eurointervention 7: 160-163. Link: https://bit.ly/2L9ESZl
Iakovou I, Foin N, Andreou A, Viceconte N, Di Mario C (2011) New strategies in the treatment of coronary bifurcations. Herz 36: 198-212. Link: https://bit.ly/3n0yEJw
Prati F, Regar E, Mintz GS, Arbustini E, Di Mario C, et al. (2010) Expert's OCT Review Document. Expert review document on methodology, terminology, and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography: physical principles, methodology of image acquisition, and clinical application for assessment of coronary arteries and atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J 31: 401-415. Link: https://bit.ly/2VWVy8w
Prati F, Guagliumi G, Mintz GS, Costa M, Regar E, et al. (2012) Expert review document part 2. Methodology, terminology and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography for the assessment of interventional procedures. Eur Heart J 33: 2513-2522. Link: https://bit.ly/3n0yW34
Tearney GJ, Regar E, Akasaka T, Adriaenssens T, Barlis P, et al. (2012) Consensus standards for acquistion, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Cohenernce Tomography Standardization and Validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 59: 1058-1072. Link: https://bit.ly/39VIQzk
Di Vito L, Yoon JK, Kato K, Yonetsu T, Vergallo R, et al. (2014) Comprehensive overview of definitions for optical coherence tomography-based plaque and stent analyses. Coron Artery Dis 25: 172-185. Link: https://bit.ly/3gqKmut
Räber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC, Johnson TW, Holm NR, et al. (2018) Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention 14: 656-677.
Johnson TW, Räber L, Di Mario C, Bourantas C, Jia H, et al. (2019) Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention 15: 44-51.
De Jaegere P, Mudra H, Figulla H, Almagor Y, Doucet S, et al. (1998) Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment. Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the multicenter ultrasound stenting in coronaries study (music study). Eur Heart J 19: 1214-1223. Link: https://bit.ly/33QVb3V
Cook S, Wenaweser P, Togni M, Billinger M, Morger C, et al. (2007) Incomplete stent apposition and very late stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. Circulation 115: 2426-2434. Link: https://bit.ly/2JDBrKh
Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Park DW, Lee SW, et al. (2007) Impact of late drug-eluting stent malapposition on 3-year clinical events. J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 1515-1516. Link: https://bit.ly/3n0zNki
Ozaki Y, Okumura M, Ismail TF, Naruse H, Hattori K, et al. (2010) The fate of incomplete stent apposition with drug-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography-based natural history study. Eur Heart J 31: 1470-1476. Link: https://bit.ly/3qHElyj
Otake H, Shite J, Ako J, Shinke T, Tanino Y, et al. (2009) Local determinants of thrombus formation following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation assessed by optical coherence tomography. JACC cardiovasc Interv 2: 459-466. Link: https://bit.ly/3n002aw
Im E, Kim BK, Ko YG, Shin DH, Kim JS, et al. (2014) Incidences, predictors, and clinical outcomes of acute and late stent malapposition detected by optical coherence tomography after drug-eluting stent implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7: 88-96. Link: https://bit.ly/36Wupc7
Prati F, Kodama T, Romagnoli E, Gatto L, Di Vito L, et al. (2015) Suboptimal stent deployment is associated with subacute stent thrombosis: optical coherence tomography insights from a multicenter matched study. From the CLI Foundation investigators: the CLI-THRO study. Am Heart J 169: 249-256. Link: https://bit.ly/3qCOqwh